Read and discuss Joyce Carol Oates on writing
P/U Oxford Book of Short Stories
Writing: Do Exercise #1:
http://thewritepractice.com/synesthesia/
https://academichelp.net/blog/synesthesia.html
http://gkbcinc.com/how-synaesthesia-can-help-improve-your-writing/
http://gkbcinc.com/how-synaesthesia-can-help-improve-your-writing/
Fiction Warm-up Exercises/Brian Kiteley
A Selection of Fiction Exercises, from The 3 A.M. Epiphany
Published by Writers Digest Books
Copyright Brian Kiteley (clicking on this will take you back to my home page)
Take a look at some sample �exercises from The 4 A.M. Breakthrough, which has just been published.
1. Synesthesia, according to M.H. Abrams in A Glossary of Literary Terms,
 is a description of “one kind of sensation in terms of another; color 
is attributed to sounds, odor to colors, sound to odors, and so 
on.”  Here is an example of synesthesia from Bruno Schulz’s Street of the Crocodiles: 
 “Adela would plunge the rooms into semidarkness by drawing down the 
linen blinds.  All colors immediately fell an octave lower [my italics];
 the room filled with shadows, as if it had sunk to the bottom of the 
sea and the light was reflected in mirrors of green water.” Schulz 
describes a change in color by means of a musical term.  Writers 
consciously and unconsciously employ this peculiar method to convey the 
irreducible complexity of life onto the page.  Diane Ackerman (in A Natural History of the Senses)
 feels we are born with this wonderful “intermingling” of senses:  “A 
creamy blur of succulent blue sounds smells like week-old strawberries 
dropped into a tin sieve as mother approaches in a halo of color, 
chatter, and perfume like thick golden butterscotch.  Newborns ride on 
intermingling waves of sight, sound, touch, taste, and, especially, 
smell.”  Use synesthesia in a short 
scene—surreptitiously, without drawing too much attention to it—to 
convey to your reader an important understanding of some ineffable 
sensory experience.  Use “sight, sound, touch, taste, and, especially, 
smell.”  600 words.
2. Deja Vu. 
 Write a 500-word sketch of a scene in which a character has an 
experience that causes her to recall a startlingly similar past 
experience.  Juxtapose the two scenes, the present one and the past one,
 on top of each other, writing, for instance, two or three sentences of 
the present moment, then alternating back and forth between present and 
past that way.  Show the reader the remembered scene by use of Italics. 
 Why would a character be haunted like this?  Think of a convincing 
reason for the deja vu experience.  Or don’t
 worry too much about convincing reasons—just let some strange set of 
events impinge on the present moment of your character.  Be playful with
 the relationship.  Simple advice to beginners: don’t be heavy-handed.  
It’s easier said than done, I know, but you can train yourself to relax 
and honor your readers with difficult and unusual human patterns of 
behavior.  Always flatter your readers by proposing a complex and 
unexpected reality.
3. The Reluctant “I.” Write
 a 600-word first-person story in which you use the first person pronoun
 (“I” or “me” or “my”) only two times—but keep the “I” somehow important
 to the narrative you’re constructing.  The point of this exercise is to
 imagine a narrator who is less interested in himself or herself than in
 what he or she is observing.  You can make your narrator someone who 
sees a very interesting event in which she is not necessarily a 
participant.  Or you can make him self-effacing yet a major participant 
in the events related.  The people we tend to like most are those who 
are much more interested in other people than in themselves, selfless 
and caring, whose conversation is not a stream of self-involved remarks 
(like the guy who, after speaking about himself to a woman at a party 
for half an hour, says, “Enough about me, what do you think of me?”).  
Another lesson you might learn from this exercise is how important it is
 to let things and events speak for themselves, beyond the ego of the 
narration.  It is very important in this exercise to make sure your 
reader is not surprised, forty or fifty words into the piece, to realize
 that this is a first person narration.  Show us quickly who is 
observing the scene.
4. Body English.
 Write a “conversation” in which no words are said.  This exercise is 
meant to challenge you to work with gesture, body language (or, as a 
baseball announcer I heard once misspeak it, body English), all the 
things we convey to each other without words.  We often learn more about
 characters in stories from the things characters do with their hands 
than from what they say.  It might be best to have some stranger observe
 this conversation, rather than showing us the thoughts of one of the 
people involved in the conversation, because the temptation to tell us 
what the conversation is about is so great from inside the 
conversation.  “I was doing the opposite of Freud,” Desmond Morris says,
 of his famous book The Naked Ape that first studied the ways 
humans speak with their bodies.  “He listened to people and didn’t 
watch; I watched people and didn’t listen.”  Because of Morris, 
according to Cassandra Jardine, “when 
politicians scratch their noses they are now assumed to be lying—and the
 sight of the Queen [Elizabeth] crossing her legs at the ankles is known
 to be a signal that her status is too high for her to need to show 
sexual interest by crossing them further up.”  Autistic children cannot 
understand human conversation even when they understand individual words
 because they cannot read facial expressions, which is clear evidence of
 how important other forms of language are.  600 words.
5. The First Lie. Tape-record
 a conversation.  It’s a tried and true method of understanding how 
people talk, but still surprisingly effective.  Obtain permission of the
 people you are taping.  Instruct your group each to tell one small lie 
during the session, only one lie.  Tell them, if they get curious, that 
some philosophers think that deception was a crucial learned behavior in
 the emergence of modern consciousness several thousand years ago.  You 
can participate in the conversation yourself, but don’t become an 
interviewer.  Let the machine run for a good long while, allowing your 
friends to become comfortable and less aware of the tape recorder.  
Listen to the tape a day or two later.  Play it several times.  Choose 
some small part of the conversation to transcribe (the lies may be 
interesting, if you can spot them, but more interesting should be all 
the other stuff they say).  Transcribe as faithfully as you can.  Do not
 transcribe more than one page of talk.  After that, fill out the 
conversation with information about the people who are speaking, giving 
us only details about them that we need to know.  The final product 
should be no longer than two pages long, double-spaced.
6. Phone Tag. Write
 a fairly long, complicated phone conversation overheard by someone in 
the room.  All three people—the listener in the room, the caller, and 
the person on the other end of the line—are involved with each other in 
some way (not necessarily romantically).  Let us hear the other end of 
the conversation, without actually hearing it.  This means you will be 
giving us only one side of a conversation, so you will have to work to 
make the side we’re hearing intriguing and capable of carrying a story. 
 The listener in the room can guess what the person on the other end of 
the line is saying, but try to keep this guessing to a minimum, and make
 sure this guesswork is done with integrity—well after the unheard 
speaker has spoken.  600 words.
7. Underground History. 
 Reread your own older fiction—one story or as many as you want to.  
Find the ten most common words from this fiction (excluding small and 
uninteresting words).  Use these words as hidden titles for ten 
paragraphs of prose.  By hidden, I mean that you should operate as in 
the above exercise, but after several rough drafts, eliminate the 
titles.  Choosing these ten words is obviously going to be somewhat 
subjective, unless you have a program that allows you to do some of the 
work for you (for instance, you could pick a word that seems to occur 
commonly, then do a MS Word global search—the find icon under edit).  
This exercise may help you uncover the trends and unexpected subject 
matter of your fiction.
8. Backwards.  Write a story backwards.  Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s Chronicle of a Death Foretold works
 this way, more or less.  Murder mysteries are told backwards, in a 
sense.  Most stories we tell orally we tell from the middle forward 
until someone tells us we’ve left out important details, then
 we double back.  You might try taking one of your own short pieces—or 
someone else’s—and simply reversing the sentences.  What then?  Unless 
you’re very lucky, you’ll have to do a good deal to make this reversed 
piece of prose make sense.  Make sure this does not become simply a 
device.  The structure should be inherently useful to the material, 
which is good advice for any fiction.  500 words.
9. Jointly Held Story. 
 Speak the beginning of a story with someone else.  Choose someone you 
know well, who also writes, but that’s not a necessity.  Choose a good 
storyteller.  Do this in a relatively private place, where you won’t be 
interrupted.  One person starts the story and continues for a few 
sentences.  The next person continues for another few sentences, and so 
on for a while.  You don’t need to start up right away after the other 
person has finished his or her bit.  End when you feel things getting 
exciting.  Both speakers should go away from the experience and write 
down what they remember of the story, but don’t write the tale down 
right away.  Let it sit in your memories for a day or so.  Don’t play 
games of one-upmanship with your partner.  Be faithful to the growing 
story and the characters created on the spur of the moment.  Listen to 
the other person’s quirks of storytelling.  Let someone else’s manner of
 creating a story guide you and influence your own story-telling style. 
 The two stories that result from this exercise ought to be quite 
different from one another.  1,000 words.
10. Home.  “Some women marry houses,” says the poet Anne Sexton, meaning presumably that these women marry not men but the ideal of house and home.  The different etymologies of these two words are instructive.  Home originally referred to village or hometown. House
 has in its earlier meanings the notion of hiding, of enclosing 
oneself.  Now house indicates any house, and home is the place that is 
central to our notions of ourselves.  Use a 
home in a story fragment (500 words).  Think about the power of rooms 
(kitchens, basements, unfinished attics, walk-in closets) on psychology 
and conversation.  In this fragment, make the house a unique participant
 (though a passive one) in the unfolding events.  The room need not be 
in a typical house.  Think about all the other rooms we become familiar 
with—classrooms, office cubicles, public 
toilets.  What are their personalities?  How do the more public spaces 
we inhabit affect our behaviors?  You might consider keeping several 
characters permanently stuck in different rooms in a house, 
communicating by shouts, cell phones, intercoms, Dixie cups, or 
telepathy.
11. In the Belly of the Beast. Describe
 an unusual interior space, one with lots of interesting appurtenances 
and gadgets sticking out: a submarine, a small plane, a subway tunnel 
away from the platform, a boiler room in the sub-basement of a high rise
 building.  Again, do not yield to the easy use of this scene.  The 
boiler room, for instance, we all expect to hide a creepy axe 
murderer-type.  Put two innocent children in it instead, romping and 
playing among the glow and roar of the fire and steam vents as if this 
were a sunny playground (their father is the superintendent of the 
building, and he prefers to keep the kids where he can see them).  500 words.
12. Absent. Construct a character who
 is not present.  You have many options here: people may talk about this
 character before meeting him, or after meeting her; you might choose to
 examine what this character owns, how he or she lives, under what 
conditions; you might use indirect approaches, like letters or documents
 that attest to the existence but not presence of the person.  How do we
 know of people?  Examine the ways we build characters in our minds and 
in our social environments before and after we meet them.
13. Ways of Seeing. Imagine
 a person with an idiosyncratic way of seeing the world (for instance, 
an occasional drug dealer, who, because of his amateur status, is more 
than usually prone to seeing danger where there is none; an entomologist
 who tends to categorize the world dryly, as if seen through a 
microscope; a world-class athlete whose clarity of vision is almost 
hallucinogenic).  Have this character witness a traumatic event that 
does not directly involve him or her.  Narrate the event from a 
first-person point of view, making sure that the perspective is 
carefully built around the idiosyncrasies of this personality.  Also, as
 a hidden aspect of this character, imagine him or her as some kind of 
unusual animal.  600 words.
14. Loveless.
 Create a character around this sentence: Nobody has ever loved me as 
much I have loved them.  Do not use this sentence in the fragment of 
fiction you write.  The sentence comes from Guy Davenport’s aunt, Mary 
Elizabeth Davenport Morrow, via his essay “On Reading” in The Hunter Gracchus. 
 Resist the temptation this exercise offers for a completely 
self-indulgent character.  Of course, some self-indulgence will be fun 
with this character.  But don’t write from inside your own wounded sense
 of the world.  500 words.
15. Loving. Write
 about a person you love.  This apparently simple instruction may be 
more difficult than you think.  What makes us love people?  How do we 
avoid being sentimental when describing the attributes that make someone
 loveable?  You will immediately be faced with the decision of writing 
about someone you love or loved romantically or as a friend.  Or perhaps
 you’ll choose a family member.  Your greatest challenge will be to make
 your reader love this person, too.  600 words.
16. Improvisation. Put
 two characters in a situation that demands improvisation, on both 
parts, which also demands that the two characters interact and 
compromise with each other in the improvisation.  We should be able to 
observe the surprise, pleasure, and frustration that result from this 
improvisation.  Remember that most of life involves one form of 
improvisation or another.  Beginning writers tend to control their 
characters too much, so in this exercise you should work hard to let the
 characters surprise themselves as well as you.  500 words.
17. True Feeling. Using
 language that is simple and straightforward, describe intensely and 
exhaustively a moment of true feeling between two characters.  Meryl Streep
 says that when she’s researching a character she’s going to portray, 
she always gives the character some simple secret that no one on the 
set, none of the other actors, and none of the other characters knows 
about.  Give the character you’re showing us this moment of true feeling
 through a secret, but don’t reveal the secret either to us or to the 
other character.
18. Teacher. In a 500-word scene, have one character teach another character something that changes the teacher. 
 But this exercise asks you to go another step beyond the first layer of
 reality.  It should teach you how to play with more than one level in 
your fiction.  The teacher learning something from her student is 
surprising, though not so unusual as you may think.  The audience is 
moved by Rose’s tragic learning curve in the movie Titanic.  
Imagine how much more interesting the film might have been had Jack 
learned something from what he taught Rose, rather than simply dying 
handsomely.
19. The Bunny Planet. Rosemary Wells has written a trilogy of children’s books collectively called Voyage to the Bunny Planet. 
 The basic problem she sets for each book is that a child (in the form 
of a young bunny) has a bad day (in prose).  Halfway through each little
 book, an unseen narrator intervenes and says that the child in question
 “needs a visit to the Bunny Planet.”  Everything alters in this other 
world, first of all by changing to rhyming poetry.  The world is better 
after we hear the words, “Far beyond the moon and stars/Twenty light 
years south of Mars,/Spins the gentle Bunny 
Planet/And the Bunny Queen is Janet.”  Wells encourages children, in 
these wonderful books, to rethink their world, to take an emotional 
timeout and find a better world than the one children frequently find 
themselves stuck in—chaos, messes, tantrums, sickness, loneliness.  What
 I want you to do in this exercise is only very tangentially linked to 
this trilogy.  Use this hinge device that Wells employs so deftly.  For 
the first part of your 500-word piece, tinge the world in darker hues,
 show us a narrative style that reflects frustration, sadness, 
alienation, whatever.  Then, with a phrase a little like this central 
phrase of Wells’s, change 
everything—especially the narrative method.  Wells goes from a very 
dense and quite beautiful prose (almost prose poetry, as the best 
children’s literature is) to this light rhyming style (although she does
 not stick to one method of rhyme—she uses couplets, quatrains, etc.).
20. The Argument.
 Two people are arguing—a man and a woman.  They don’t have to be a 
couple.  Each is convinced he or she is right.  You, as the writer, do 
not know—and do not want to know—who is right, but you will have 
exquisite sympathy for both points of view, both sides of the argument. 
 How do men and women argue differently? Couples tend to disagree over 
relatively minor issues, which often stand for larger issues.  Give us 
enough background and history, but try to stay in the moment as much as 
possible.  Narrative PoV is going to matter here a great deal: writing 
from one or the other’s PoV is likely to make
 it very difficult to show both sides fairly.  An omniscient narration 
may seem to be the answer, but I don’t like omniscient narration—I don’t
 think it’s really possible in fiction about contemporary life.  Choose 
an accidental arbitrator—a third party narrator, either first or third 
person narration.  This narrator knows and likes both these people well,
 but doesn’t and can’t favor one over the other.� 600 words.
21. Standup. The usual method of the standup comedian monologue is apparently casual connections.  For instance, Elvira
 Kurt once started a monologue with the simple idea of bad hair.  “As a 
five-year old, you never had bad hair days.  You woke up with hair 
straight up, and you said, ‘I look great!  I slept in my swimsuit and I 
feel wonderful!’  Mother made clothes for me—horrible outfits.  She 
probably laughed herself to death.  I got back at her.  When I told her I
 was gay I said it was because of those clothes.”  Note the deliberate 
movement from plain detail to plain detail, with great leaps between the
 details—the mother making clothes to the coming-out declaration.  We 
are not expecting this transition (nor for that matter the simpler 
transition from bad hair to mother making clothes).  But the transitions
 are funny, and they affect us, shock us even in this day and age.  
Write a 600-word standup comedy monologue, fitting it into a story 
situation you’ve already begun working on.  Don’t make it obvious to 
your reader that you are doing a stand-up routine—just tell a story as 
if you were doing a monologue in front of a smoky, irritable audience, 
with a Late Show talent scout scribbling notes at the bar in the back.
22. The Joke. End
 a 600-word fragment of a story with a joke you like or loathe.  Use the
 joke as a way of coloring the whole passage, but don’t just lead up to 
the joke.  The joke should be relatively short, and it might be better 
if the joke is somewhat odd.  A guy walks into a bar.  He says to the 
bartender, “I’ll have one g-g-gin and t-tonic, p-p-please.”  The 
bartender says, “One g-gin and t-tonic c-c-coming up.”  The customer 
glares suspiciously at the bartender, who smiles innocently.  Another 
patron walks into the bar and says, “Scotch on the rocks, barkeep.”  The  bartender
 says, “One Scotch rocks, coming right up.”  A moment later he brings 
the gin and tonic to the first customer, who says, “You were m-m-mimick-k-king m-m-me.”  The bartender, with a truly pained look on his face, says, “N-n-no.  I was m-m-mimicking that other g-guy.”
23. Outrunning the Critic. Write
 100 short sentences about a character you are working on in a piece of 
fiction. The sentences should not connect and should not follow one 
another in any logical way.  The idea of this exercise is to force you 
to outrun your own thoughts and intelligence and critical mind.  Be 
careful not to be monotonous, using the name of your character or a 
pronoun to start each sentence.  A better exercise would be to write 200
 or 500 sentences about this character, but 100 sentences is still enough of a stretch to make this useful.  The idea for this exercise comes from a collaboration the poet John Yau did with a painter, which was to match 1,000 small watercolors with sentences by Yau.  John Yau is the author of Edificio Sayonara, Forbidden Entries, and Hawaiian Cowboys, among other books.
24. Rehearsal.
 Imitate the method of actors rehearsing a scene, repeating lines and 
whole sections of a speech, going over mistakes, etc., with several 
familiar characters of yours. Use this social trial and error to find 
new, submerged material for your story. You should think of this 
exercise as artificial and behind-the- scenes work, but it may also 
trigger strangely realistic conversation.  Human beings constantly 
rehearse and re-rehearse their lines.  The anarchic rhythm of 
conversation is more akin to a social science experiment than to the 
polish of theatrical dialogue.
25. Surprise.
 Write a short scene about a character you’ve become familiar with over 
time—either your own fictional creation or a character based on someone 
you know.  Start the scene by letting the character do what you expect 
this character to do.  But at some point in the sequence of events, 
allow the character to do something completely out of character.  Let 
the character surprise you.  This exercise demands that you consider 
what is expected and unexpected in a character.  You may want to make a 
list, behind the writing of this scene, of the kinds of things this 
character usually does; and another list of the sorts of things this 
character would never do.
No comments:
Post a Comment