This story has a background in fact. Welty wrote it on the night she
learned of the murder of Medgar Evers, a local black civil rights leader
much like the fictional Roland Summers, which took place in 1963 in her
hometown of Jackson, Mississippi. Unaware of the killer’s identity, yet
familiar with the bitterness of racism and class resentment, she
created a poor white narrator who so closely resembled the real murderer
that several details of the story had to be altered before its
publication in The New Yorker, in order to avoid prejudicing the case.
A major strength of the story is the speaker’s voice, rich in local dialect, which also reveals him as uneducated and self-righteous. A proud man, he feels himself betrayed by everything in which he has believed. Clearly, he is a man overwhelmed by a growing movement he does not comprehend and cannot prevent. By allowing this narrator to tell his own story, Welty does not treat him as a stereotypical villain but presents him with understanding and even a certain level of compassion.
The credibility of the story is increased by passing references to historical persons, including Governor Ross Barnett of Mississippi; Caroline Kennedy, the young daughter of then-president John F. Kennedy; and James Meredith, the African American student whose enrollment integrated the University of Mississippi. In addition, sensory details are plentiful. When the narrator describes his early morning journey to Summers’s neighborhood, he offers a litany of typical street and business names, locating the familiar railroad tracks and the lighted bank sign that gives the time and temperature. He notes the brutal heat, even at night; the intense emotional pressure that he experiences; and his sudden relief when Roland Summers falls.
Perhaps the most obvious symbol is the gun. Although the gun bestows temporary power on a powerless man, the narrator tells his wife that he threw his rifle in the weeds because the barrel was scorching hot and because there was really nothing worth holding on to anymore. At the story’s end, he has replaced the gun with his old guitar, an enduring part of his own past, while he plays and sings “a-Down” to comfort himself—a mindless refrain and a foreshadowing, for now he, not Roland Summers, is going down.
A major strength of the story is the speaker’s voice, rich in local dialect, which also reveals him as uneducated and self-righteous. A proud man, he feels himself betrayed by everything in which he has believed. Clearly, he is a man overwhelmed by a growing movement he does not comprehend and cannot prevent. By allowing this narrator to tell his own story, Welty does not treat him as a stereotypical villain but presents him with understanding and even a certain level of compassion.
The credibility of the story is increased by passing references to historical persons, including Governor Ross Barnett of Mississippi; Caroline Kennedy, the young daughter of then-president John F. Kennedy; and James Meredith, the African American student whose enrollment integrated the University of Mississippi. In addition, sensory details are plentiful. When the narrator describes his early morning journey to Summers’s neighborhood, he offers a litany of typical street and business names, locating the familiar railroad tracks and the lighted bank sign that gives the time and temperature. He notes the brutal heat, even at night; the intense emotional pressure that he experiences; and his sudden relief when Roland Summers falls.
Perhaps the most obvious symbol is the gun. Although the gun bestows temporary power on a powerless man, the narrator tells his wife that he threw his rifle in the weeds because the barrel was scorching hot and because there was really nothing worth holding on to anymore. At the story’s end, he has replaced the gun with his old guitar, an enduring part of his own past, while he plays and sings “a-Down” to comfort himself—a mindless refrain and a foreshadowing, for now he, not Roland Summers, is going down.
10. The author chose the title "Where is the Voice Coming From" to illustrate the allusiveness of the voice in the story. The title acts as a metaphor for the original event, which involved a lack of knowing who killed the man, Roland. There's this struggle within the story to identify the speaker and narrator, as there was to identify the original killer.
ReplyDelete10) The title that was selected for this story sums up the main question the story create. Who's really the narrator? The narrator doesn't have a name throughout the story, so the reader never knows exactly who the narrator is. The title gives you a constant question that you think about during the time that your reading the story.
ReplyDelete10. The reason being that the title "Where is the voice Coming From" is titled that is because most of the people in the story remain anonymous. Also its a main point in the story because the voices jump around.
ReplyDeleteBe specific in referring to the story. Where is the voice coming from?
DeleteReyenne & Amanda
ReplyDelete10. None of the other titles would work because it's in a singular voice. The voice is coming from the views of the south and how they're not willing to change. The significance of the title is that it shows there are multiple people feeling the same way about blacks in general especially during the Civil Rights movement.
Good response--you got it.
Delete10. Since there isn’t really a main narrator I don’t think any other titles would fit the main idea of the short story. The title shows the views from many racist people on blacks. I think that the title now is a great title and no other title would be significant.
ReplyDeleteBut there is a main narrator...where does the voice come from?
DeleteWhat motivates the voice in terms of beliefs and prejudices?
10. The significance of the title of the story, "Where is the Voice Coming From?" is that the narrator is not named throughout the story making the reader wonder as to 'why?' and all that we have is the narrator tone and how he's like. Which makes the title fit the story.
ReplyDeleteSpecifics? Why don't the other titles fit?
Delete10. The significance of the title of the story, "Where is the Voice Coming From?" is that the narrator is not named throughout the story making the reader wonder as to 'why?' and all that we have is the narrator tone and how he's like. Which makes the title fit the story. The narrator is coming from the South as they go through the dark times, such as the Civil Rights movement and seems to be racist and hostile same goes with his wife meaning that its their "voices". The other titles wont be a fit due to the story because although some may mention "Unknown" they don't seem to relate.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYou did not answer the question about the story. Please read the story and respond accurately if you want credit for this.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete10. The reason that the title "Where is the Voice Coming From?" is titled the way it is because Welty felt like this story would be better completed that way. The story shows comparison to the events of the story, where they were not positive who the killer was. Also, the narrator's identity is never completely established, which also gives the same theme of "where is the voice coming from?" The other titles wouldn't work because other than "Voice from an Unknown Interior," the titles weren't fitting of the story and didn't properly describe the story and make the reader interested.
ReplyDelete10. "Where is the Voice Coming From?" has two significant meanings. First it is indicative of the large racism that took hold in the south and the anonymous prejudice that comes with it. The hatred of the stories character is not just his own, but of thousands of other racist people. Along with this the character himself struggles with cementing his own identity and his struggle with being less notable than a black man. Welty plays with the idea that the "voice" is born from ideas and from the collective population of a people. Who the man is specifically is irrelevant. But the voice of his beliefs and of those who would condone his actions is far more important.
ReplyDelete'Where is the voice coming from' is a significant title because it relates to the mystery surrounding the identity of the voice. I believe 'A voice from the Jackson interior' would have also been a good choice because it supports how the voice is representative of the racist views from that time. I believe the voice is that of the racist mindset of that time and the inequality.
ReplyDeleteThe significance of the title is that the narrator is talking about his experience killing Roland. He knows exactly what happened but no one else can figure out who murdered him.”on Tv and in the paper, they dont know but half of it. They know who Roland Summers was without knowing who I am” (page 485) It almost seems as if the voice is upset he cant get credit for what he had done. The title “where is the voice coming from” is also significant because it suggests that it is not only the narrator who contains the racist views of black people, but the whole town. “I was already tired of seeing a hundreds cops getting us white people nowheres.” The voice refers to them as us so the voice is more than just him.
ReplyDelete